Legal Opinion
Liechty v. Terrill Trucking Co.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided November 22, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 1069PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*591MEMORANDUM OPINION
NEESE, District Judge.
The defendant has moved the Court ex parte to order the plaintiff Mrs. Lietchy to submit to a mental examination by a psychiatrist and the plaintiff Mr. Lietchy to submit to a physical examination by a dermatologist. Rule 35(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such rule requires that such an order “ * * * may be made only on motion for good cause shown and upon notice to the person to be examined and to all parties * * *”. Idem.
The only notice the defendant appears to have given is by service of a copy of the motion upon “ * * * adversary counsel of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hardy v. RiserDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
- Timpte v. District Court in and for City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- Lindsey v. EscudeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Pierce v. Th. Brovig of FarsundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lichtor v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- State Ex Rel. McCloud v. SeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Sexton v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- Looney v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
- Powell v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.