Legal Opinion

Reilly v. California Street Cable Railroad

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1946No. Civ. 13033PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.

The respondent sued the appellants cable company and Grace Brothers and the latter’s driver, for concurrent negligence resulting in a collision in which respondent was injured. She recovered a verdict of $11,000 against all defendants, and from the judgment entered thereon they appeal.

On June 29, 1943, shortly after 9 a. m. respondent was a passenger in the front seat on the right-hand side of the open, forward section of a cable car descending easterly on California Street between Grant Avenue and Kearny Street, in San Francisco, where the grade is 13% per cent. A truck and trailer of Grace…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  4. O'Connor v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Lahti v. McMenaminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thompson Pacific Construction Inc. v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Ellen Rozario v. Kim RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Blythe v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Connor v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Carlin v. PrickettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API