Legal Opinion

Carlin v. Prickett

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1947No. Civ. 15756PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLEE, J. pro tem.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment for plaintiff entered upon a verdict of a jury in an action for damages for personal injuries. Defendants also appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. As an appeal does not lie from an order denying a motion for a new trial, the appeal from that order is dismissed. (Reilly v. California Street Cable R. R. Co., 76 Cal.App.2d 620, 631 [173 P.2d 872].)

Respondent, driving her Chevrolet coupe, proceeded easterly on Third Street in Los Angeles toward its intersection with La Brea Avenue. Her daughter-in-law and a friend were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lafargue v. United Railroad of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Earl v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. MacPherson v. West Coast Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Nelson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Balero v. LittellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Styskal v. BrickeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Harris v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Resch v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Schoenbach v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API