McGinn v. Van Ness
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Geo. E. Crothers, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action to foreclose a lien for street work under a public contract affecting the property of the defendants. The assessment was made under the procedure provided by Ordinance No. 2439, New Series, of the city and county of San Francisco, approved September 4, 1913, under and by virtue of the power given to the supervisors of that municipality by section 33, chapter II, of article VI of its charter. The trial court decreed a foreclosure of said lien, and from such decree the defendants have prosecuted this appeal.
The first point insisted upon by the appellants is that of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- McLaughlin v. KnoblochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bienfield v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Girvin v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Flynn v. ChiappariCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Fay Improvement Co. v. HanlonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Stokes v. WatkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921