Legal Opinion

Joan Woodruff v. Hewitt P. Tomlin, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1975No. 74--1876PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEICK, Circuit Judge.

The sole question in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs’ action for damages for malpractice against their attorneys, the defendants, was barred by the Tennessee one-year statute of limitations, Tennessee Code Annotated § 28-304. 1 The District Court held that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The Court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. The plaintiffs appealed. We reverse.

Joan and Patricia were minor sisters. Their father employed the attorneys, the defendants, to represent them in their claims for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Teeters v. CurreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bland v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Albert v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Charles C. Hodge v. Service MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  5. Frazor v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Knight v. FurlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Anderson v. NealSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Neylan v. MoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API