Teeters v. Currey
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
This malpractice action essentially involves a determination of whether the statute of limitation begins to run from the date of the injury or from the date of the discovery of the injury.
The admitted facts are that on June 5, 1970, plaintiff gave birth to a normal child. Defendant was the attending physician. Following delivery, because of edema, anemia and other medical complications, he recommended that plaintiff have a bilateral tubal ligation, the purpose of which was to avoid future pregnancies. Defendant performed this surgery on June 6, 1970, and her recovery was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Hays v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Hackworth v. HartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Carvell v. BottomsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Norman Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Shadrick v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Pero's Steak and Spaghetti House v. LeeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Benton v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.