Legal Opinion
Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 6, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 5880PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERSON, Judge.
I. FACTS
In this appeal, we are called upon to decide when a cause of action accrues for legal malpractice occurring in the course of litigation. The facts are as follows.
Attorney Leslie L. Miller previously represented Amfac Electric Supply Company (Amfac) in an action for materials furnished to a subcontractor but for which full payment had not been made. One day before trial, the defendants moved to dismiss the suit contending that Amfac was not qualified to do business in Arizona and was therefore prohibited from bringing an action in the state pursuant to A.R.S. §…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Siegel v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Wisener v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Sato v. Van DenburghArizona Supreme Court · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Knight v. FurlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Schoenrock v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.