Alvord v. Spring Valley Gold Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
This was an action to foreclose a mortgage alleged to have been given by the Spring Val*551ley Hydraulic Gold Company, a New York corporation, on its mining property in California, to secure payment of certain bonds of that corporation. The court below held the mortgage invalid for want of a compliance with the act of April 23, 1880 (Stats. 1880, p. 131), which requires the ratification of the holders of at least twothiras of the capital stock. Many interesting questions have been argued by counsel, but only one of them need be considered.
The complaint contained, among other things, the following…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Flint v. CadenassoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Sublett v. Henry's Turk & Taylor LunchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Irvine v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Montgomery v. DornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.