Commonwealth Land Title Co. v. Kornbluth
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARABIAN, J.—
Introduction
Appellants John Bruins, Hetty Bruins, and James F. Bruins, and Ismael and Rosalinda Contreras (herein, the Bruins and the Contreras), appeal from a trial court order granting the application of respondent Commonwealth Land Title Company (Commonwealth) for a writ of execution and an order allowing it to sell certain dwellings, one owned by the Bruins and one owned by the Contreras. The separate appeals of the Bruins and the Contreras were consolidated for purpose of review by this court. We reverse and remand.
Statement of Facts
The original plaintiffs in this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Savings Bank v. CreswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Irvine v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roybal v. University FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Dieden v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re MaddoxUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1987
- Alcove Investment, Inc. v. Conceicao (In Re Conceicao)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- DAK Industries, Inc. v. Dot-Line Transportation (In Re DAK Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.