Weyant v. Murphy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of El Dorado County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
The material facts of this case are as follows: One Segur, who was the owner of two tracts of land, which may be designated respectively as the El Dorado tract and the Sacramento tract, mortgaged them both to Mrs. Alice Scott, to secure the payment of sixteen thousand dollars. Subsequently Segur sold and conveyed the El Dorado tract to certain parties for eight thousand dollars. Of this sum, one thousand doMars only was paid in cash. The grantees agreed to pay the remaining seven thousand dollars to Mrs. Scott on account of the principal of said mortgage, which agreement was expressed in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Johnston v. S.F. Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by7 opinions
- Irvine v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Kaiser v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Epperson v. CappellinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Strain v. Security Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hilfiker v. PreyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.