Legal Opinion

People v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1960No. Civ. 24314PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

The state, through the Department of Public Works, sued the city of Los Angeles, Van M. Griffith, and others to condemn their interests in certain lands known as Griffith Park for the construction of a state highway. After a trial without a jury, judgment was entered condemning the land to plaintiff, awarding the city the sum of $3,750,000 and denying defendant Griffith compensation. He alone appeals from the judgment. The within litigation arose out of the state’s condemnation of approximately 200 acres of land within Griffith Park maintained by the city of Los Angeles for the construction…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Contributors to the Pennsylvania Hospital v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Faus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. City of Glendale v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Alamo School District v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. City of Beaumont v. Beaumont Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API