Legal Opinion
City of Beaumont v. Beaumont Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1965No. L. A. 28147PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.
Plaintiff, an incorporated city in Riverside County, brought an action to condemn all the property of the Beaumont Irrigation District. The district demurred to the complaint on the grounds .that it did not state a cause of action and that the court had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter. The court sustained the demurrer, the city failed to amend the complaint, and judgment was entered dismissing the action. The city appeals from the judgment. The facts alleged in the complaint are deemed to be true for our purposes. (Isrin v. Superior Court (1965) ante, p. 153 [45 Cal.Rptr. 320, 403 P.2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- County of Marin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- People Ex Rel. City of Downey v. Downey County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Oakland RaidersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Marina v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Satterfield v. GarmireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Glenbrook Development Co. v. City of BreaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.