Minsky v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
This case presents the question whether the claims statutes (Gov. Code, § 900 et seq.) requiring the presentation of certain claims against the government within designated time limits 1 apply to an action by an arrestee for the return of property taken by local police officers at the time of arrest and wrongfully withheld following the disposition of criminal charges. We do not think that the claims statutes were intended to cover a case in which the city takes the property of an arrested person, holds it as a bailee, and retains it for the city’s own use. Hence…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Mozzetti v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.