Legal Opinion

Kiseskey v. Carpenters' Trust for Southern California

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1983No. Civ. 66721PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCLOSKY, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs Peter Kiseskey and Susan Kiseskey appeal from an order of dismissal entered after the general demurrer of Carpenters Local Union No. 1506 to plaintiffs’ fifth amended complaint (hereafter FAC) was sustained without leave to amend on the basis of the statute of limitations. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 340, subd. (3).)

By that FAC, Peter Kiseskey sought damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and his wife Susan M. Kiseskey sought damages for loss of consortium.

In the first cause of action of the FAC, plaintiffs alleged, among other…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Schneider v. TRW, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Intel Corp. v. HamidiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Delfino v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Cochran v. CochranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API