In re the Personal Restraint of Breedlove
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, C.J.
— The issue in this personal restraint proceeding is whether a criminal defendant may, as part of a plea agreement, stipulate to the imposition of an exceptional sentence. ■
We answer in the affirmative and hold that a stipulation to an exceptional sentence, made as part of a valid plea agreement, may be a substantial and compelling reason that justifies the imposition of a sentence outside the standard range. Such an exceptional sentence must be one that is authorized by statute. We also hold that a trial court imposing such a sentence has an independent statutory duty to make findings of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re LordWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 2004
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.