Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Breedlove

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1999No. 66425-1PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, C.J.

— The issue in this personal restraint proceeding is whether a criminal defendant may, as part of a plea agreement, stipulate to the imposition of an exceptional sentence. ■

We answer in the affirmative and hold that a stipulation to an exceptional sentence, made as part of a valid plea agreement, may be a substantial and compelling reason that justifies the imposition of a sentence outside the standard range. Such an exceptional sentence must be one that is authorized by statute. We also hold that a trial court imposing such a sentence has an independent statutory duty to make findings of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. In Re LordWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 2004

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API