Legal Opinion
State v. Shattuck
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 6, 2005No. C6-03-362PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
In an order issued last December, we determined that under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), the district court’s imposition of an upward durational departure from the presumptive sentence prescribed by the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines violated appellant Robert Shattuck’s Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury. State v. Shattuck, 689 N.W.2d 785, 786 (Minn.2004). We indicated a full opinion would follow, and we directed the parties to file supplemental briefs on the issue of remedy-
*134The issues presented by this appeal arise out…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. FrawleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Deegan v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.