Legal Opinion

Kogan v. Bergman

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 6, 1966No. Civ. 28723PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *

Appeal by defendants from a judgment entered in an action upon a promissory note and cross-appeal by plaintiffs from a portion of such judgment.

The evidence below discloses the following: The plaintiffs, commencing in about the year 1952, purchased, through the defendant Robert Bergman, numerous promissory notes secured by deeds of trust. Robert Bergman acted in the capacity of a broker in these transactions, and his company took care of all of the details relating thereto such as preparing all documents, recording of documents and providing for the proper disbursement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Merced Security Savings Bank v. CasacciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Westman v. DyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Beckwith v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Kaiser Industries Corp. v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Fellom v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Barclays Bank International, Ltd. v. CrequeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1976
  5. Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API