Legal Opinion

Tahoe National Bank v. Phillips

California Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1971No. Sac. 7857PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*14Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Defendant Beulah F. Phillips appeals from a judgment of the El Dorado County Superior Court that holds that an instrument entitled, “Assignment of Rents and Agreement Not to Sell or Encumber Real Property” (hereinafter referred to as “the assignment”) was intended to be an equitable mortgage, and decrees its foreclosure.

We conclude that this judgment must be reversed. Plaintiff bank, which occupied the more powerful bargaining position and deliberately chose to use a standardized form providing for the assignment of rents and a covenant against conveyances, cannot be…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Computer Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Qantel Corporation, Computer Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Qantel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API