Legal Opinion
Avocado Sales Co. v. Wyse
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1932No. Docket No. 8225PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment denying the injunction prayed for and dissolving the temporary injunction previously issued.
The facts, as set out in the findings, are as follows: That one Joseph L. Brodkey, predecessor and founder of the Avocado Sales Company, the plaintiff in this action, had, between the dates of August, 1925, and January, 1928, built up a large and lucrative business in the sales of avocados in the city and county of Los Angeles, and that he did employ defendants Sam A. Wyse and Barney M. Rothschild in the months of November and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Witkop v. BoyceNew York Supreme Court · 1908
- Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- New Method Laundry Co. v. MacCannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Pasadena Ice Co. v. ReederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Aetna Building Maintenance Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Scott v. Snelling and Snelling, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.