Legal Opinion
Mitsch v. American National Property & Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 2007No. A06-1626PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s decision to dismiss on summary judgment her claim seeking underinsured-motorist (UIM) benefits under an insurance policy issued by respondent American National Property and Casualty Company (AN-PAC). Because (1) the application of that covered policy’s reducing clause in this context violates Minn.Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 4a (2006), and (2) appellant’s claim for UIM benefits does not result in a conversion of first-party coverage to third-party coverage, we conclude that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. v. Widness Ex Rel. WidnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Hammer v. Investors Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Economy Premier Assurance Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Frey v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Johnson v. CummiskeyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Carol Jansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.