Legal Opinion
Carol Jansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 21, 2017No. A16-0916Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge
Appellant moved for summary judgment in this action for no-fault medical-expense benefits on the ground that the district court lacked jurisdiction. The district court denied the motion. We reverse.
FACTS
Respondent Carol Jansen was injured in a motor vehicle accident on December 5, 2013. At the time of the accident, Jansen was insured under an automobile insurance policy issued by appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The policy provides $20,000 in coverage for no-fault medical-expense benefits. Jansen applied for no-fault benefits, and State Farm made…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Mitsch v. American National Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Hippe v. American Family Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997