Legal Opinion
Frey v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 8, 2008No. A06-2445PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant insurer challenges the district court summary judgment determination that reduced-liability (drop-down) limit provisions in automobile insurance coverage for resident family members is ambiguous, unenforceable, and inapplicable to respondent claimant. Although we agree with appellant that the drop-down limit for resident family members are enforceable, we conclude that the drop-down limit set forth in this policy does not apply to respondent. Accordingly, we affirm.
FACTS
On November 27, 2004, seventeen-year-old appellant Nathan Frey was involved in a one-vehicle…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Board of Regents v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Babinski v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Evelyn I. Rechtzigel Trust Ex Rel. Rechtzigel v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Bundul v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Babinski v. American Family Insurance GroupDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Babinski v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.