Legal Opinion

Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 2011No. A10-2090PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.*

Appellant Tammy Pepper disputes the district court’s summary judgment dismissing her claim for UIM benefits under a policy issued by respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). Pepper was injured when she was struck by a pickup truck owned and insured by her sister, Tracie Drew, but driven by State Farm’s policyholder, Frank Matlachowski, who is Pepper’s stepfather. Concluding that the State Farm policy wrongfully excludes UIM coverage for Pepper’s claim of benefits from Matla-chowski’s policy, based on the inadequacy of Drew’s liability…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Meyer v. Illinois Farmers Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API