Hillcrest Vineyard v. BD. OF COM'RS OF DOUGLAS
Court of Appeals of Oregon
GILLETTE, J.
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
In this writ of review proceeding, petitioners challenge a circuit court order affirming a decision by the Douglas County Board of Commissioners (Board) approving a proposed subdivision plan. In spite of the fact that the soils in the area to be subdivided are predominately Class III and IV, the Board concluded that the land in question did not have to be preserved as farm land pursuant to statewide planning Goal 3 of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) because it could not be farmed profitably and zoning it as exclusive farm use would not be consistent with existing needs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 1000 Friends of Ore. v. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs, Etc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Meyer v. LordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Norvell v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Meeker v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CLATSOP CTY.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by11 opinions
- Baxter v. Monmouth City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Gage v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Wasson v. ADULT & FAMILY SERVICES DIV., ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Black v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Cascade Forest Products, Inc. v. Accident Prevention DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.