Legal Opinion

Gage v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1993No. 93-030; CA A80355PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s decision affirming the City of Portland’s approval of respondent FP-35 Partners’ application for a minor amendment to a planned unit development (PUD). We reverse.

The city granted final development plan approval for the original PUD in September, 1984, more than eight years before its approval of the amendment in the present proceeding. In their first assignment to LUBA and to us, petitioners contend that the city hearings officer, who rendered the final decision, erred by not responding in her order to petitioners’ argument that, under former PCC 33.79.140…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Green v. HaywardOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Weeks v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. West v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gage v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Zippel v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Crook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Friends of Bryant Woods Park v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API