Legal Opinion

Norvell v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 1979No. Agency 1151, CA 10193; Agency 1151, CA 10425PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

Petitioners 1 seek review of an order of the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission (hereafter, "Boundary Commission”) which approved the annexation to the City of Portland of 106 acres of mostly undeveloped land in Multnomah County. Petitioners have leveled a shotgun blast 2 at virtually every finding made by the Boundary Commission relating to the Statewide Planning Goals, and also have challenged the Commission’s failure to make findings with respect to a number of the Goals. We agree that the Boundary Commission’s findings are insufficient and therefore reverse,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Graham v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Dose v. ToozeOregon Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Spray v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Willamette University v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Marion County v. Federation for Sound PlanningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Hillcrest Vineyard v. BD. OF COM'RS OF DOUGLASCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API