Legal Opinion

Meeker v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CLATSOP CTY.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1979No. TC CC 77-303, CA 9164, SC 25951PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*667TONGUE, J.

This case involves the application of the Land Conservation and Development Commission’s (LCDC’s) Statewide Planning Goal 3 "to preserve and maintain agricultural lands” as that Goal relates to the subdivision of 82 acres of agricultural land in Clatsop County. The Board of Commissioners of Clatsop County approved a proposed plan to divide that land into 6 parcels ranging in size from 10 to 20 acres. Petitioners are two local residents who challenged this decision by a writ of review in the circuit court. The circuit court approved the Board’s decision and dismissed the writ. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Rutherford v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Meeker v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CLATSOP COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Wetherell v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hillcrest Vineyard v. BD. OF COM'RS OF DOUGLASCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Flury v. Land Use Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API