Meeker v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CLATSOP CTY.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*667TONGUE, J.
This case involves the application of the Land Conservation and Development Commission’s (LCDC’s) Statewide Planning Goal 3 "to preserve and maintain agricultural lands” as that Goal relates to the subdivision of 82 acres of agricultural land in Clatsop County. The Board of Commissioners of Clatsop County approved a proposed plan to divide that land into 6 parcels ranging in size from 10 to 20 acres. Petitioners are two local residents who challenged this decision by a writ of review in the circuit court. The circuit court approved the Board’s decision and dismissed the writ. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Rutherford v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Meeker v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CLATSOP COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Wetherell v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Hillcrest Vineyard v. BD. OF COM'RS OF DOUGLASCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Flury v. Land Use Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.