Legal Opinion
Black v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 16, 1985No. 84-AB-161; CA A31186PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*737ROSSMAN, J.
Claimant appeals an Employment Appeals Board order which disqualified him from receiving unemployment compensation.1 Because EAB failed to consider claimant’s principal argument, we reverse and remand for reconsideration.
Beginning in September, 1982, claimant was employed by a drug and alcohol treatment clinic as a resident assistant. He has a history of substance abuse but has been drug and alcohol free since early 1982. Employer’s personnel rules provide that misuse or abuse of alcohol or other mind-altering substances may constitute grounds for suspension. Claimant signed a copy…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- People v. WoodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smith v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Black v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Dupont v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Black v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.