Legal Opinion
Friedland v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 20, 1945No. Civ. 7127PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
Petitioner, in a petition for writ of mandamus before this court,- alleges that he is plaintiff in an action filed in the Superior Court of Sacramento County, against the State Board of Equalization and its members, in which action he “seeks a review by way of trial de novo under the provisions of sections 46 and 47 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act of the actions and decisions” of the board and its members under the authority of the aforesaid act; that said action is at issue and, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, came bn regularly for trial on October 9, 1944; that the court…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Bank of Italy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Palmer v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Berkeley Unified School District v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Lotus Car Ltd. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.