Legal Opinion

Eischen Cabinet Co. v. Hildebrandt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 29, 2004No. A03-358PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, RUSSELL A, Justice.

A mechanics’ lien ceases 120 days after the last work is completed unless the mechanic files a claim statement with the county recorder’s office and serves upon the property owner, either personally or by certified mail, a copy of the claim statement. Minn.Stat. § 514.08, subd. 1 (2002). In this ease, we are asked whether service by certified mail of a copy of a mechanics’ lien claim statement upon the property owner, as permitted by Minn.Stat. § 514.08, subd. 1(2) (2002), is effective upon mailing or upon receipt and we hold that service is effective upon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Jorgensen v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Guillaume & Associates, Inc. v. Don-John Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API