Legal Opinion

Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 2012No. A10-1607PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

This case involves two mechanic’s liens foreclosed against a hotel property. An agent of the respondent lien claimants, Hunter Construction, Inc., and Verde General Contractor, Inc., personally served mechanic’s lien statements on the property owner. Appellant, Briekwell Community Bank, challenges the validity of this service. Briekwell argues that service of a mechanic’s lien statement under Minn. Stat. § 514.08, subd. 1(2) (2010), is subject to the provision in Minn. R. Civ. P. 4.02 that prohibits a party to the action from serving “a summons or other process.”…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Current Technology Concepts, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Gacke v. Pork Xtra, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  5. Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. League of Women Voters Minnesota v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Minnesota Ex Rel. Northern Pacific Center, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. State of Minnesota v. Roger Benedict SchmidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Jay Nygard v. City of OronoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  5. In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API