Carlson v. Chermak
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge. *
Appellant landowner Dorothy Carlson unsuccessfully sought a variance from respondent Douglas County’s shoreland development ordinance. She did not appeal the denial by the Douglas County Board of Adjustment (BOA), but five months later, after the 30-day statutory period for appeal had run, she commenced this declaratory-judgment action challenging the applicability and enforceability of the shoreland ordinance to her property. The district court assumed subject-matter jurisdiction and dismissed the action on the merits, concluding the ordinance was applicable to Carlson…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- County of Freeborn v. ClaussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Handicraft Block Ltd. Partnership v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Davidner v. DavidnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Neitzel v. County of RedwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. GrigsbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014