Semler Construction, Inc. v. City of Hanover
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This is an appeal from a district court decision upholding the city’s denial of final plat approval for a subdivision that had been given preliminary approval. The district court reasoned that a one-year ap proval period had run and- found that an interim moratorium applied to Semler. The district court granted summary judgment for the city on Semler’s damage claim.
Semler contends the denial was erroneous as a matter of law because (a) it had been given approval of the preliminary plat for an eight-year period; (b) the interim moratorium did not apply; and (c) there are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In re the Amended Administrative Penalty Order to Westling Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Birch Publications, Inc. v. RMZ of St. Cloud, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Harstad v. City of WoodburyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Save Lantern Bay v. Cass County Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004