Legal Opinion

Semler Construction, Inc. v. City of Hanover

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 2003No. C6-02-2151PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

This is an appeal from a district court decision upholding the city’s denial of final plat approval for a subdivision that had been given preliminary approval. The district court reasoned that a one-year ap proval period had run and- found that an interim moratorium applied to Semler. The district court granted summary judgment for the city on Semler’s damage claim.

Semler contends the denial was erroneous as a matter of law because (a) it had been given approval of the preliminary plat for an eight-year period; (b) the interim moratorium did not apply; and (c) there are…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. In re the Amended Administrative Penalty Order to Westling Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Birch Publications, Inc. v. RMZ of St. Cloud, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Harstad v. City of WoodburyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Save Lantern Bay v. Cass County Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API