Garrett Company v. Collins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
This was an action instituted by the plaintiffs in error. Garrett Company and Geraldine McClung, as plaintiffs, against the defendant in error, H. O. Collins, as defendant, for the piupv.se of partitioning certain real estate, and for the recovery of a four-ninths interest in 142 acres of the allotment of Sarah A. Doyle, deceased, a full-blood Creek citizen.
The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, which is, substantially, as follows:
That the land involved in this controversy was the homestead allotment and a part of the surplus allotment of Sarah A. Doyle,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Utermehle v. NormentSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Armstrong v. LettySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Wilson v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Battiest v. WolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crawford v. BriantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- In Re Sixkiller's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Carlile v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Johnson v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Worley v. MuskratSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.