Legal Opinion

Garrett Company v. Collins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1924No. 14581PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This was an action instituted by the plaintiffs in error. Garrett Company and Geraldine McClung, as plaintiffs, against the defendant in error, H. O. Collins, as defendant, for the piupv.se of partitioning certain real estate, and for the recovery of a four-ninths interest in 142 acres of the allotment of Sarah A. Doyle, deceased, a full-blood Creek citizen.

The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, which is, substantially, as follows:

That the land involved in this controversy was the homestead allotment and a part of the surplus allotment of Sarah A. Doyle,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Utermehle v. NormentSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Armstrong v. LettySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Wilson v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Battiest v. WolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crawford v. BriantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. In Re Sixkiller's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Carlile v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Johnson v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Worley v. MuskratSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API