Legal Opinion

Carlile v. Harmon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1936No. 26876PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error, Imogene E. Carlile, as plaintiff, instituted an action in equity in the district court of Co manche county, Okla.,’ against Mrs. John L. Harmon, as executrix of the last will and testament of Henry N. Pope, deceased, as defendant, seeking to recover certain real property of which Henry N. Pope died seized. It appears in the record that the plaintiff is a niece of Henry N. Pope, deceased, and that in 1908, when then about twelve years of age, she came to Lawton, Okla., to live with her aunt and uncle, John L. Harmon, upon his promise to her family that she would be treated…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Utermehle v. NormentSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Noyes v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Waggoner v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  4. Estate of MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Fry v. MorrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Cully's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Smith v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. In Re Cully's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Robertson v. RobertsonNelson County Circuit Court · 1993
  5. Smith v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API