Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Letty

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 14, 1922No. 9974PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Pitchford, V. C. J., and Kane, J., dissenting. Error from District Court, Pontotoc County; J. W. Bolen, Judge. Action by John Letty against George W. Armstrong, L. W. Clapp, and others in ejectment and to set aside will and other instruments affecting title. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendants named bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

This action was commenced by the defendant in error John Letty, as plaintiff, against the plaintiffs in error and the other defendants in error, as defendants, for the purpose of recovering possession of a certain tract of land situated in Pontotoc county and for canceling and setting aside a certain will and other instruments in writing affecting the title to said real estate. Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, upon which judgment was duly entered, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

There is very little, if any, conflict in the evidence…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. McArthur v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Jefferson v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Parker v. RichardSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Goodrum v. BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Courtney v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Coats v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Mantz v. GillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Caesar v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. Ferguson v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API