Legal Opinion

Battiest v. Wolf

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1924No. 11202PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Judgment was rendered in this case in the district court of Murray county against the plaintiffs in error, Solomon Battiest et al., plaintiffs below, and in favor of the defendant in error, Mat Wolf, defendant below, in an action by plaintiffs to recover as heirs their alleged interest in the allotment of Elijah Woods, deceased. The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, containing exhibits, and other record evidence. Said statement is lengthy and we do not deem it necessary to set the same out in full.

It was agreed that Elijah Woods, the al-lottee, whose lands…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. LettySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Wilson v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. In Re Byford's WillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Leard v. AskewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Sixkiller's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Copeland v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Garrett Company v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Anglin v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Lauderdale v. TookoloSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API