in the Interest of M.C.T., a Child

OPINION

DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.

I. Introduction

Appellant Tina A. appeals the termination of her parental rights to her son, M.C.T. In three points, Appellant argues that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the termination order, that she was denied effective assistance of counsel, and that family code section 263.405® violates her right to due process. We will affirm.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

M.C.T., Appellant’s biological son, is an emotionally disturbed and educationally and developmentally delayed twelve-year-old boy. Appellant has two other sons, J.T.,…