in the Interest of A.T., a Child
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice O’NEILL.
Mother and Father appeal the trial court’s judgment terminating their parental rights to A.T. Both parents argue the evidence is factually insufficient to support the trial court’s finding (1) they knowingly placed or allowed A.T. to remain in conditions or surroundings that endangered the physical or emotional well-being of A.T. or (2) they engaged in conduct or knowingly placed the child with persons who engaged in conduct that endangers the physical or emotional well-being of A.T. They further argue the evidence is factually insufficient to support a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- in the Interest of M.C.T., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
- in the Interest of T.N.S., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- in the Interest of N.T., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- In the Interest of J.D.B., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- G.M. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
- In the Interest of B.M. and M.M., Children v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2024
- In the Interest of J.G., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2024
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.