Legal Opinion

Hermosillo v. Hermosillo

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1998No. S-7886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

I. INTRODUCTION

Richard Hermosillo appeals the superior court’s denial of his Alaska Civil Rule 60(b) motion seeking relief from a child custody, visitation, and support order. We conclude that the superior court erred in faffing to incorporate Child Insurance Benefits (CIB) into its calculation of Richard’s child support arrears and in ordering that visitation sanctions would offset that debt. 1 We remand to the superior court for a recalculation of Richard’s child support arrears.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

During their marriage, Richard and Mary Hermosillo had one child, Paul, born…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beck v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Nass v. SeatonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Miller v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Turinsky v. LongAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. O.R. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wells v. BarileAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Martinez v. Cape Fox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Osmar v. MahanAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mark A. Rosenbaum v. Pamela ShawAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Whah v. WhahAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API