Legal Opinion

Wells v. Barile

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2015No. 7060 S-15590PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Tammy Wells appeals the superior court's grant of a motion to modify child custody filed by her former husband Primo Barile. Tammy also challenges the court's child support order, its order that she reimburse Pri-mo for half their child's Permanent Fund Dividends (PFDs), and a writ of assistance the court issued for the custody order's enforcement. She also alleges that several of the superior court's rulings show judicial bias and a failure to give her the leniency appropriate to her status as a pro se litigant.

We conclude that the superior court abused…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Jacob v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Bauman v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Coghill v. CoghillAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Peter v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Adkins v. CollensAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Mengisteab v. OatesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Geldermann v. GeldermannAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Ivy v. Calais Company, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Downs v. DownsAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API