Legal Opinion

Osmar v. Mahan

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2002No. S-10299PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

When the trial court calculated Mindy Lynn Osmar's child support obligation for her son, Steele, the court included in Mindy's income the Social Security benefits that Ashley, Mindy's child from a previous marriage, receives because of the death of Ashley's father. Yet, federal law restricts Mindy's use of these benefits to Ashley's care and maintenance; they are not available to support Steele. We therefore conclude that the trial court erred by including the payments in Mindy's income for purposes of determining child support under Alaska Civil Rule…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. BennettAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Miller v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Faulkner v. GoldfussAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. J.L.P. v. V.L.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. C.G.A. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brotherton v. State, Department of Revenue Ex Rel. BrothertonAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. John B. Morris v. Andrea L. MorrisAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Brotherton v. State, Department of Revenue Ex Rel. BrothertonAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Torres Rodríguez v. Carrasquillo NievesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2009
  5. Torres Rodríguez v. Carrasquillo NievesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API