Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Cape Fox Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2005No. S-11197PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal challenges a superior court order imposing a permanent bar from reelection on a former corporate director who was found to have engaged in misconduct. The barred director argues principally that the superior court was not authorized under AS 10.06.463 to bar him from reelection because he was no longer a director at the time of the judgment and that the court’s findings were inadequate to support a lifetime ban. He also argues that he is entitled to partial indemnification of his defense expenses. We conclude that the superior court had the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,813 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ratilal K. PatelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wetherhorn v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. LevineDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Henrichs v. Chugach Alaska Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In Re Estate of BlodgettAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API