White v. Henry

The question for decision is whether the Chancellor erred in sustaining the bill of Ralph M. "White and others for review of a decree for error of law apparent, such decree being entered in another suit between the same parties, that decree being in favor of Keith M. Henry and others, appellants here, and defendants to the bill of review.

Litigation between the parties with reference to the subject matter involved has reached this Court twice heretofore. Refer to 194 Tenn. 192, 250 S. W. (2d) 70, and 195 Tenn. 383, 259 S. W. (2d) 862. The present case involves three separate subsequent suits…