Legal Opinion

Grizzard v. Fite

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1916PublishedCited by 36 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Davidson County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court. —A. Gr. Rutherford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LafsdeN

This ease is before us upon petition for certiorari to the court of civil appeals. The case presented by the petition is as follows:

The suit was brought by Mollie E. Grizzard against the defendants to recover damages for breach of contract. The defeiMants plead in abatement, in substance, that before the bringing of the present suit the plaintiff herein had filed a bill in the chancery court of Davidson county to cancel and rescind the same contract for fraud. The plaintiff demurred to this plea, the demurrer was overruled, and the suit dismissed; but it was provided in the order of the court…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Robb v. VosSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Fowler v. . Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Conrow v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Connihan v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Ludington v. PattonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Barger v. WebbTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Davis v. Tennessee Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Boatner v. Providence-Washington Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Frederickson v. NyeOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Ward v. University of the SouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1962

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API