Legal Opinion

Martin Marietta v. Board of Leavenworth County

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 20, 1981No. 50,163PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Abbott, J.:

This case involves the issuance of a special use permit to establish and operate an underground rock mine in a rural area. The trial court issued a writ of mandamus ordering the defendant, Board of County Commissioners of Leavenworth County (county commissioners) to issue the permit to the plaintiff, Martin Marietta Aggregates. This appeal is taken by landowners in the general area who were allowed by the trial court to intervene, and whom we will refer to as intervenors. The county commissioners do not appeal.

We believe the following issues are before us:

1. Was mandamus an…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Henderson v. HassurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Mobil Oil Corporation v. McHenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Golden v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Brooks v. DietzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parker v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. Skahan v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  3. Taco Bell v. City of MissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Frank Hardie Advertising, Inc. v. City of Dubuque Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  5. Sprint Print, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API