Legal Opinion

Red Acres Imp. Club, Inc. v. Burkhalter

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1951PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

This bill was filed by fifteen owners of residences in a residential subdivision in Memphis and by the corporation connected therewith known as Red Acres Improvement Club. The defendants, Dr. Burkhalter and wife, are the owners of a rather handsome residence in that subdivision. Dr. Burkhalter is a physician and maintains a doctor’s office in that dwelling. The allegation of the bill is that he is conducting at this dwelling a “medical business house”, and that in so doing he is violating the Zoning Ordinance of Memphis, and thereby causing a very substantial depreciation in the value of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. Central Drug Store v. AdamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. City of Little Rock v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Framingham Clinic, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. City of Knoxville v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Steppach v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  4. Lions Head Homeowners' Ass'n v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  5. State Ex Rel. Morris v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API