Legal Opinion

People v. Southern Pac. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1930No. Docket No. Sac. 4160PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The sole question presented for decision to the trial court in these three actions was whether the street-car and interurban railways of the Southern Pacific Company, situated in the county of Alameda, were subject to a tax of five and one-quarter per cent or of seven per cent upon their gross receipts for the years 1920, 1921 and 1922. The answer to this question involves the correct interpretation of the amendment to the Constitution of the state adopted in 1910, and often referred to as Constitutional Amendment No. 1. By this amendment a new section was added to the Constitution which was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Veterans' Welfare Board v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Stockton v. Common Council of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Rich v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. HallnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API