Jones-Hamilton Co. v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a summary judgment in favor of defendant. The question presented is whether the trial court was justified in granting the motion of defendant for the summary judgment; and the consideration of this question turns on whether or not sections were added to the Revenue and Taxation Code 1 in violation of requirements of the Constitution of the State of California.
Statement of the Case
In 1963 the California Legislature passed Senate Bill No. 5 which added sections to the Revenue and Taxation Code call ing for the calculation and payment of estimated corporation…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Delaney v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- C. L. Smith Co. v. Roger Ducharme, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Smith v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.