Legal Opinion

Jones-Hamilton Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1968No. Civ. 24672PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a summary judgment in favor of defendant. The question presented is whether the trial court was justified in granting the motion of defendant for the summary judgment; and the consideration of this question turns on whether or not sections were added to the Revenue and Taxation Code 1 in violation of requirements of the Constitution of the State of California.

Statement of the Case

In 1963 the California Legislature passed Senate Bill No. 5 which added sections to the Revenue and Taxation Code call ing for the calculation and payment of estimated corporation…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Delaney v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. C. L. Smith Co. v. Roger Ducharme, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Smith v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API