In the Interest of CT v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] This appeal challenges certain procedures and orders in a juvenile court matter. We reverse because the juvenile court did not follow statutory mandates.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] 1. Did the juvenile court violate the appellant’s right to the due process of law by failing to advise him of the terms and conditions of probation?
2. Did the juvenile court err by failing to consider a predispositional report prior to disposition?
3. Did the juvenile court err by failing to select a statutory sanction level and by failing to impose the appropriate terms of probation for that sanction…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Butcher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Garcia v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thompson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- ENDRIS v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Jackson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Chester Loyde Bird v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Bustos v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.